Anton Chuvakin posted a blog entry today about Continuous Compliance. I've written on the subject in numerous places (here for example) and have even written a white paper and given a webinar on the topic.
As a software vendor, I often hear from organizations who are looking for the silver bullet. People actually say things like "your software is PCI compliant, right? ...because we need to be PCI compliant and I'm looking for software to get us there". It's not their fault. Apparently, the folks pushing down the requirements, despite their efforts, haven't done a great job at educating the people that need to be educated.
My paper and my responses explain that the idea isn't to find a piece of software or even a business process that will get you compliant for your audit next month and then you forget it until next year. The idea is to create what I've called a "culture of compliance" (a borrowed phrase) through which you remain in compliance continuously. Put controls in place, create a way to test controls, understand access rights, regularly monitor and review permissions, and you'll ultimately be able to respond to any new (related) regulation that comes at you.
Sure, I can map specific reports to specific subsections of a regulation or security framework, but that shouldn't be the goal. Take a look at our recent article on the topic: When compliance is at odds with security - sometimes focusing on the goal of point-in-time compliance can actually negatively affect your security posture. I hope Anton is right that the times may be upon us because I have to say that I often feel like people listen to what I'm saying but ultimately ignore it and really just want a set of reports labelled with the regulation du jour.
1 comment:
Matt,
This is a great example of why IAM needs to break out of the classic 'information security' mold. People hear infosec and their heads immediately assume 'NO'and their ears close without ever really understanding the question. PCI is a great example of this.
When you start framing conversations instead in the vernacular of risk and compliance, consistently, their ears stay open and the conversation can continue. Then the culture can start to take hold.
Thanks for sharing.
Post a Comment